Log in Register

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

fb mb tw mb

Tuesday 19th Sep 2017

One of the most tragic stories of this past off-season was the passing of 29-year-old Tommy Hanson. The former Atlanta Braves pitcher died from "delayed complications of cocaine and alcohol toxicity," per his autopsy report.

I still remember vividly seeing the then-22-year-old pitch in person for the first time as he totally dominated the 2008 Arizona Fall League. Hanson compiled a 5–0 record with a 0.63 ERA while striking out 49 in just 28 2/3 innings. That earned the Oklahoma native the AFL’s MVP Award, as the first-ever pitcher to achieve that honor.

Due to some strange rules that have since been changed for the better, by having finished sixth in the Xperts Fantasy League (or XFL) in 2008, I owned the first pick in the league’s auxiliary draft in April 2009.

Though it had been six months since I had been wowed by Hanson’s performances in the desert, I felt certain that the 6-foot-6 right-hander could be an anchor for my keeper league roster for the next six to eight seasons at least. (Future salaries of XFL players acquired while still minor leaguers only grow by $3 per season compared to $5 for all other players, increasing their keeper value.)

I had a dilemma, however. The legend of San Diego State pitching phenom Stephen Strasburg - who struck out 23 batters in one game and was hitting 100 mph on scouts’ guns – was already growing. At the time of our April 2009 draft, Strasburg was nearly through his junior year, during which he went 13-1 with a 1.32 ERA and 195 strikeouts in 109 innings.

In a few months, the Scott Boras client would become the number one selection in the 2009 First-Year Player Draft. After a very delicate negotiating period that ended less than two minutes before the signing deadline, Strasburg agreed to terms with the Washington Nationals.

But on that day in April, I had to make a decision. Do I take the seemingly surer thing in Hanson and hope he can help power my sixth-place squad in the 15-team league to the top in 2009, or gamble that the college kid Strasburg would really become a “generational talent” in the Major Leagues?

I ended up taking Hanson with the first pick. Surprisingly, Strasburg fell to number three, with the second pick used on Nelson Cruz. Though he was traded twice in the XFL in the seven years since, Strasburg remains on his original contract in our league, currently at just $19.

Fast forward to 2015, when I came in fourth in the XFL. (Strasburg’s team was third.) With a revised set of rules that make far more sense, that finish presented me with the third selection in our April auxiliary draft.

I felt I had another Hanson-Strasburg type of looming ahead between two very different players from different continents.

Newly-signed Korean first baseman Byung-ho Park had a solid spring with his new club, the Minnesota Twins, suggesting the difficult-to-predict transition from baseball in the East to baseball in the West would prove to be ok in his case. Because he had no prior MLB experience, Park was even more appealing as a “+3” player in the XFL.

On the downside, Park was still unproven in MLB games that count. His age, 29, was not ideal and with Joe Mauer entrenched at first base for the Twins, Park may end up being a DH-only player for the remainder of his career. Of course, that limits fantasy roster flexibility and value.

The other player most prominently on my radar screen was slugging Cuban third baseman Yulieski Gurriel. Like Strasburg in spring 2009, Gurriel was not even yet under contract with an MLB club. While his hitting pedigree is impeccable, his age (32 in June) is a concern – especially given my intention of continuing to compete for a title in the XFL this season and for the foreseeable future.

When push came to shove, I was willing to give up results this season in return for greater upside, albeit for a potentially shorter period of time. If I had the choice, I decided I would pass on Park and take the elder Gurriel.

As often occurs in drafts, it did not begin as I expected. The first pick was Dodgers rookie starter Kenta Maeda. Pick number two went to a traditional prospect, hurler Blake Snell, soon to be ready to join the Rays. Both are solid picks as +3 players, but not my first choices.

That meant my field was still wide open. I stuck to my plan and took Gurriel while Park remained on the board until nabbed by a delighted but surprised Ron Shandler with the fifth overall pick.

Early returns are clearly in Shandler’s favor as Park swatted his seventh long ball of the season Tuesday night, putting him on a full-season pace for 42. Still unsigned, Gurriel has not been in the news for weeks.

Only time will tell if my Gurriel gambit proves to be more successful than my decision to pass on Strasburg in favor of Hanson seven years ago. Either way, here is hoping I don’t remember it as vividly, for multiple reasons.

 Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

When I strictly stay on point with this column - which is increasingly rare – the subject is fantasy baseball rules. I share information about rules I have seen and/or experienced and offer my thoughts to you for possible use in your own leagues.

This week, the topic is the waiver wire, and specifically, the rules associated with filling roster needs. The two leagues I will compare and contrast are both well-known industry competitions – Tout Wars and League of Alternative Baseball Reality (LABR).

I have been a participant in the former for over a decade, but joined the latter for the first time here in 2016.

In Tout Wars, players can be moved from the active roster to the reserves and back at will – at least prior to the weekly transaction deadline of first pitch on Monday. The size of the reserve rosters was dropped from six to four players a few years back to cut down on prospect hoarding in anticipation of call-ups later in the season.

Another consideration is an unlimited disabled list, from which players can be “cashed in” for a FAAB rebate if the owner so chooses.

The Tout approach, which seems fairly standard, means that when an owner is considering a free agent acquisition each week, he has maximum flexibility. When rostering a player after winning the bidding, the owner can release a player from his active roster or from his reserves. In the latter case, an active player would be sent down to make room on the active roster for the new acquisition. (That assumes there were no openings due to a disabled list assignment.)

LABR is very different. Its rules generally do not allow active players to be reserved. The ramifications of winning a FAAB bid on a player is that he is then stuck in your lineup until injured or sent down to the minor leagues – or until the owner releases him. Streaming of pitchers, for example, is not possible.

(I said “generally” in the prior paragraph because there is a twist. The LABR reserve list of six players as set on draft day have special privileges. They alone can be shifted between active and reserves as often as needed.)

Let’s use a current example to illustrate the differences.

This past Sunday evening, I had interest in the Cincinnati closer situation. My need was especially acute in Tout, because I did not win bids on any established closers on draft day.

The leader in the Reds race to potentially succeed J.J. Hoover – at least the pitcher I perceived to have the best skill – Tony Cingrani, was already owned. That was more a testament to his overall value than a March bet on him becoming the closer. That left Blake Wood and Caleb Cotham, with the slight advantage of both being right-handed. Seeing the former used in the fifth inning the other day moved him out of my consideration.

That left Cotham, for whom I placed a $33 bid. On a basis of $1000, that was not particularly aggressive, but it reflects my shaky confidence level in him. With half the league bidding on him, Cotham went for $83, while Wood remains on the waiver wire, since his conditional-only bids were not met.

I made a conditional bid as well, putting down $12 on David Phelps of Miami, who is moving into late-inning duty, but that offer only brought me second place to the $37 winner.

These bids were placed knowing I could easily lop off my roster an underperformer from among my reserves.

In LABR, I wanted the same two pitchers. However, my decision whether or not to bid was much more difficult. None of my nine regular pitchers could be sent down and kept. The only one who was even a candidate to be released was Brandon Maurer of San Diego, whom I had just watched give up three runs in one inning to St. Louis that very day.

Still, I believe in Maurer’s skills and consider his chances of getting a closing job behind Fernando Rodney to be as good or better than Phelps’ odds of supplanting A.J. Ramos this season or Cotham becoming the man in Cincinnati.

For those reasons, I stood pat. Others among my peers must have felt similarly as Cotham drew just two bids in LABR (compared to six in Tout). Further, the winning offer was just $3 (on a basis of $100), compared to $8.30 in comparable LABR FAAB.

For Phelps, there were also just two LABR offers compared to four in Tout. Both bids were $1 versus $3.70 in equivalent LABR cash.

Both the lesser quantity of bids and the smaller amounts suggest to me the inherent limitations in weekly bidding driven by the LABR rules.

So in your league, if you would like to tamp down the weekly free agent churn and slow down the quantity of bids and their prices, consider the more limiting approach followed in LABR – specifically by requiring all players taken out of the active lineup from week to week to be released – unless injured or demoted to the minor leagues in real life.

I am still new enough with LABR to have not fully formed my opinion about this rule. My gut tells me I like the more wheeler-dealer style in Tout, but I’ve only been through three FAAB cycles to date.

In support of the LABR approach, because the inherent costs for everyone to bid are higher, I think I would have better odds of winning – when I really want a player enough to bid aggressively.

This past week, either of my losing reliever bids in Tout would have been enough to win the desired player in LABR (if on the same pricing scale).

In closing, here is the relevant section from the LABR constitution, in case you would like to consider a change to this approach for 2017.

“Teams may reserve players in one of three ways. The first is through the reserve draft on auction day. Six slots are reserved for this purpose. Players that go onto the disabled list may also be reserved on a separate list. There is no limit to the number of disabled list players that can exist on a roster. Players that are sent to the minors or who are drafted as unsigned free agents can be moved from the active roster to the reserve list as long as the reserve list does not exceed six players. A player can be dropped from the reserve list at any time.

"A player from the original reserve list (from reserve draft) can be moved from active status to the reserve list at any point during the season, provided the reserve list does not exceed six players.”

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Given my day job is covering the St. Louis Cardinals system, I understand why all eyes around the table at any fantasy draft fall on me when a Cardinals player is nominated. Especially in National League Tout Wars, my peers are conditioned to expect my actions could signal that I possess some “insider” information.

Bid aggressively, and I am high on the player. No bidding at all may mean something is up.

In reality, I have found that over time, I had been more negative than not about Cardinals players, focusing more on their weaknesses than strengths. As a result, I have missed out on some nice bargains over the years.

I resolved for 2016 to be more aggressive about those whom I know best. I just wish it was working out better.

I came into the second free agent period this past weekend with six holes in my NL LABR lineup. They occurred due to a combination of injuries (Aaron Altherr, Ender Inciarte, Tyson Ross, which put $47 of my draft-day spend on the DL), minor leaguers drafted to stash for later (Lucas Giolito and Dansby Swanson) and unexpected demotions to the minors (Andrew Susac).

Due to my missed first week of free agent bidding in NL LABR, the subject of this column last week, I felt like I had really missed out on important opportunities. This week, I was especially motivated to take action to recoup my time lost to inaction. Of course, it all depends on which free agents are available.

As fate would have it, I needed a middle infielder and outfielder most of all and the two top free agents this week are both Cardinals – Aledmys Diaz and NL batting leader Jeremy Hazelbaker. I really like their opportunities for the remainder of this season, especially after they ignited a Cardinals offense that had been flat in the club’s opening 0-3 series in Pittsburgh.

In LABR, it appeared I won both players after bidding $6 and $11 on the two Cardinals, respectively. However, due to snafus with the waiver process this week, my Hazelbaker bid was ultimately trumped by an $18 offer from Steve Moyer of Inside Edge.

After watching St. Louis’ home opener on Monday afternoon, I felt even worse about losing out. In the game, in which Hazelbaker started in left field, the 28-year-old went 4-for-4, including a triple, raising his batting average to .526 on the young season.

Of course, Moyer will not receive the benefit of Hazelbaker’s initial hot streak preceding Monday and certainly, the rookie will cool off. Yet, it does not seem to be a coincidence that I most often come in second place in my FAAB bidding. But that is a topic for another day.

With his recent success, Hazelbaker’s story is being repeated often, so I will just share the basics. The one-time Red Sox draftee was languishing in the Dodgers’ system and one month into the 2015 season, he was released. The Cardinals were the only organization who called - with a need for a Double-A outfielder.

Hazelbaker tore up the 2015 Texas League with a .900 OPS and raised that to 1.000 after his promotion to the Pacific Coast League, despite only touching .800 in his minor league past. Again a free agent last fall, he returned to the Cardinals for 2016 in gratitude for the confidence they showed in him in 2015.

Despite a strong spring, Hazelbaker was destined to return to Triple-A until the last possible moment – when shortstop Ruben Tejada was injured in the final Grapefruit League contest - and he bought more time in the bigs when oft-injured Tommy Pham was hurt during the second inning on Opening Day.

Speaking of openings, an opportunity for regular playing time on an extended basis may have presented itself for Hazelbaker, in part due to Matt Holliday’s winter experiment to learn how to play first base. Every day Holliday is used at first opens up left field for Hazelbaker. The real losers in this scenario could be Matt Adams and Brandon Moss.

Though Hazelbaker has made a few starts in center ahead of Randal Grichuk, it was due to the latter’s poor regular season start after a solid spring. I do not expect Hazelbaker to knock Grichuk out of his starting role. Same with Stephen Piscotty in right.

The stories of Diaz, a 25-year-old Cuban, and regular St. Louis shortstop Jhonny Peralta have been intertwined from the time they joined the organization – each as a free agent prior to the 2014 season. Though both secured four-year Major League contracts, the unproven Diaz began his career at Double-A.

The organization’s hope at the time was that after a year or two, Diaz would emerge as Peralta’s replacement in St. Louis, freeing the aging, mid-30’s version of Peralta to move to third base or left field or become a super-sub.

As it has turned out, Peralta’s offense as a Cardinal has been as good or better than expected. In fact, he led the 2015 club in home runs and RBI at the break and was named an NL All-Star. His defense, never his strong suit, has remained steady, dulling any expected need to move him off the position.

From his side of the equation, Diaz did nothing to push his way into the MLB picture for most of his first two professional seasons. The first year was ruined by a sore shoulder, perhaps aggravated by his pre-signing workouts after mostly being out of action for several years after leaving Cuba.

Last July, after languishing for most of two seasons in the Cardinals system, Diaz was outrighted – taken off the Cardinals’ 40-man roster. Whether it was motivation or sheer coincidence, shortly after, Diaz caught fire at Double-A Springfield, which continued with Triple-A Memphis and extended into the Arizona Fall League.

When Peralta was injured very early in camp this spring and expected to miss the first half, Diaz was thought to have a chance to fill in. Yet with his checkered history and just 17 games of experience at Triple-A, the Cardinals were more comfortable with a veteran - hence they signed Tejada, who had been released by the Mets a few days prior.

Matters changed quickly with the aforementioned injuries to Tejada and Pham, which led the Cards to revisit Diaz. He made his MLB debut just a few days after Hazelbaker, and like the outfielder, Diaz hit immediately. Unlike the Cardinals’ other primary option at the position, Jedd Gyorko, Diaz is a natural shortstop, though his defense has been a bit shaky early on.

Diaz has just a few more days to show he can be an everyday player - until Tejada is ready. As long as Diaz continues to perform, I think the Cards would start him over Tejada. In other words, Diaz is in the driver’s seat to earn starters’ at-bats until at least the All-Star break. Down the road, Peralta’s thumb injury could affect his power upon his return, creating more uncertainly from which Diaz could continue to benefit.

In closing, Tout Wars bidding this past weekend offers an interesting comparison to the prices in LABR. While I wanted both Hazelbaker and Diaz in both leagues, my needs were more pronounced in LABR. In other words, my bids were less in Tout and as a result, I lost out on both free agents there. The outfielder fetched $177 (on a basis of $1000) and the shortstop was acquired for $143 by others.

In the big picture, Hazelbaker’s price was almost the same in the two leagues, but Diaz went for more than double in Tout in comparable dollars ($14.3 vs. $6 on a basis of $100).

In both industry leagues, owners are showing they are not afraid to spend early. Hoarding FAAB in hopes of mid-season standouts changing leagues is becoming a less and less prevalent strategy.

These two acquisitions could offer their new owners almost a full season of production as a result, so if this pair of new Redbirds are still available, take a hard look at them - and if you want them, bid aggressively.

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Why in the world at 1:00 a.m. on Saturday morning, April 16 – instead of going to bed after a long week - did I turn over to a game in the eighth inning in which Kansas City was visiting Oakland? In doing so, I switched off the Giants at Dodgers contest.

After all, I am a National League guy, right?

DFS is the reason – specifically a second-year contest called Tout Wars Daily.

If you are a long-time full-season fantasy player but haven’t yet committed to daily action, this article is for you. On the other hand, if you are already all-in on daily play, you know where I will be coming from.

Still with me? OK!

Have you ever had a traditional league title come down to the last day of the season? You nervously hammer your remote control and the enter key on your computer or phone, scanning games and monitoring box scores for each player on your and your opponent’s rosters while living and dying with the success and failure of each at-bat.

When the last West Coast contests are nearing their end, the intensity increases to an almost unbearable level until the final outcome is clear.

That is what precisely happened to me on an otherwise mundane Friday night in mid-April. In fact, that same final-day excitement can be recreated each and every day with DFS.

In the interest of full disclosure, I have not yet jumped into daily play with both feet, though as you will see, my resistance is becoming weaker and weaker. I have looked at it similarly to golfing (in real life, not fantasy). If I cannot commit the time to become above-average in the game, it is not worth the time and frustration to simply be mediocre.

Tout Wars Daily has pulled me in, though. Not only is it a once-a-week daily contest, taking less time out of my schedule, my competitors are not some random, faceless userids. The players are sourced from all the Tout Wars leagues – some my best friends and most well-known industry players in the world.

How could one not get up for that?

Each Friday, all the Tout warriors select their one best lineup for the evening. The season consists of five four-week segments. The top three finishers in total points in each segment receive a ticket to the final, which will be held on August 26.

In Week 1 of the 2016 competition, I finished first among the 41 Touts who participated, with a 56-51 edge over the second-place finisher, Doug Anderson (rotodaddy).

Heading into Week 2, I knew I could again compete. What was key for me was that I had allocated ample time in the late afternoon to study lineups and batter versus pitcher histories - which is over and above basic identification of “hot and cold” players, checking weather forecasts and the like.

Without a couple of hours to really research my lineup options and figure out the tradeoffs on how to best fit them under the salary cap, it is like golfing without having practiced putting and hitting balls at the driving range first. Lacking full preparation means the odds are high that the result will be middling at best.

Last Friday, my efforts helped me identify Dodgers second baseman-outfielder Kike Hernandez’ past success against Giants ace Madison Bumgarner. Though it is inexplicable, some average-at-best hitters seem to own superstar pitchers. So it was here. All Hernandez did Friday night was hit two home runs and knock a two-run double in his three Friday at-bats against MadBum. For just $3700, Kike delivered 16 points, highest on my team.

When setting my final lineup that afternoon, I was torn whether or not to take the obvious pitching play – Clayton Kershaw at home against those rival Giants. Coming up with the $9900 to roster Kershaw meant I had to drop my declared top hitter of the day in St. Louis third baseman Matt Carpenter ($5800).

In hindsight, that decision almost sunk me. Kershaw was not dominating, at least for him, with a number of other pitchers delivering higher value on the evening. Yet, the Dodgers ace was throwing a shutout through five innings.

But Kershaw lost points when he gave up two runs in the sixth. Our excellent stats provider, RTSports.com, refreshed the live scoring with Kershaw at 6 2/3 innings. At that point, I was tied for first at 84.66 points with “ThePME”. Patrick Mayo is among the toughest competitors, having been the third-place finisher in Week 1.

I had Kershaw and Kike still playing, while Mayo had A’s catcher Stephen Vogt live. The latter was already 2-for-2 with a home run.

I was crushed when I saw Dodgers manager Dave Roberts sit down next to Kershaw on the bench, almost certainly telling his ace that his day was done after seven innings and a 7-2 lead. Saving bullets is the right answer for a 162-game season, but not for my evening’s hopes. As it turned out, all was not lost. Kershaw’s final out of the seventh was worth 0.34 points, breaking my tie with Mayo.

My secret weapon Hernandez had been neutralized, however, as MadBum was already in the showers. When Giants skipper Bruce Bochy went to his pen, Kike’s kryptonite was useless as he went 0-for-2 the rest of the way. When Hernandez came to the plate in the eighth, he appeared to be my last hope to open up my 0.34 point lead. Instead, he crushed my irrational hopes for a fourth hit, grounding into a double play.

With my roster done for the night, I turned over to the KC-Oakland game to root against Vogt. At 1:04 a.m., I woke up my entire household with one screamed f-bomb as the catcher singled with two out in the bottom of the eighth.

That base hit, which was meaningless in the context of the game when Vogt was stranded, scored one point for Patrick. In the process, he took over first place, 85.66 to 85.00.

I went to bed defeated, but I could not sleep. No one – and I mean no one - wants to finish a very close second in any endeavor.

When I awoke (later) Saturday morning, I was delighted to see that I had in fact won. I had not noticed that Kershaw’s four-point win had yet to be included in the scores. That gave me a roller-coaster 89.00 to 85.66 victory.

The best news is that I have another shot this week and I will again be ready for the excitement of competition against the very best!

To follow along with Tout Wars Daily each Friday, check out the results live at RTSports.com.

If you haven’t yet started to play DFS, consider taking your first steps with Mastersball. RealTime Fantasy Sports hosts a Mastersball Daily 50-50 GPP (Guaranteed Prize Pool) contest with $135 in prizes available for just a $5 entry fee. Take our free trial DFS projections on your test drive and compete against the Mastersball staff at RealTime Fantasy Sports here.

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

The very title of this column series, Articles of Configuration, is intended to inform the reader of my interest in writing about the intricacies of fantasy baseball rules and practices and how you might benefit from them in your own leagues.

Unfortunately, too often I find myself using my own missteps as examples of what not to do. Here is another such case, with this blunder having occurred well before the first pitch on Opening Day.

While what follows may sound like an excuse, I am considering it an explanation, instead. If you are like me, your week immediately preceding Opening Day is filled with various league drafts. After all, most everyone prefers to wait as long as possible before picking teams.

Though I am a long-time fantasy industry member, we have our own local leagues as well to incorporate into busy calendars. Many travel to central locales such as Las Vegas or New York for the NFBC Main Event Drafts. And so on.

Yet, one of my industry leagues, LABR, traditionally drafts very early, offering one data point to readers interested in how those who devote long hours to fantasy baseball select our own teams.

Of course, a lot has changed since the LABR drafts held way back on March 5-6. That greatly increases the importance of the first waiver period – not only to fill injured player gaps, but also to seize spring training sensations – in hopes they can stem the tide and actually keep it up when the games really matter.

My week was further complicated by two dead laptops, only one of which was due to my negligence. The anger, confusion and scrambling to try to recover data from a failed hard drive had to have taken a couple of years off my life.

Against this backdrop, I mentally prepared to get through my final drafts on Saturday and use Sunday morning to finalize my approach for waiver pickups in both LABR and Tout Wars.

Earlier, I had analyzed my rosters and plotted out which holes I wanted to fill - along with identifying which players would either be disabled or released from my rosters. I decided to wait until the last moment for the final step – to identify my target free agents and determine my maximum bid prices.

With all MLB clubs not required to finalize their opening 25-man rosters until noon Eastern on Sunday, there could still be some surprises ahead, I assumed.

I knew I needed fill four holes. Not fully well this spring, Giants reserve catcher Andrew Susac was sent down to Triple-A to play every day, so I needed a short-term fill-in. I also hoped to find a better utility player than Pittsburgh’s Matt Joyce and had an open spot. During our reserve draft, I gambled that then-free agent Marlon Byrd would sign with an NL team. Since it did not turn out that way, I had to drop him.

On draft day, I made a stash move for Phillies shortstop J.P. Crawford, then taking as a reserve Alen Hanson of the Pirates to cover. Since then, the Bucs’ signing of David Freese led to a chain reaction that included Hanson going back down to Triple-A. Hence an unexpected opening.

Finally, my early March bet on the Phillies’ closer carousel was Luis Garcia. Though many names were mentioned during March, Garcia was not among them. In fact, he opened the season in Triple-A, making him worthless as my projected fill-in for another stashee, Washington’s Lucas Giolito.

As an aside, one nice touch was applied in LABR to remove the timing challenges and conflicts between when players are placed on the disabled list and fantasy waiver deadlines for week 1. LABR pre-defined and shared with all participants a list of players sure to go on the DL to start the season, then made the preemptive move to designate all of them as disabled on the league’s website well before the first deadline. That wise decision removed randomness and owner angst.

This all would have worked out perfectly for me – except for one thing – my negligence.

LABR also did another smart move, but something that none of my other leagues did. For the first week only, the waiver deadline was moved up to Saturday night, April 2 at 7:00 p.m. Eastern. That way, opening fantasy rosters could be set before Sunday’s games.

I would have loved the approach – had I not waited until Sunday morning to thoroughly read the series of pre-season emails from the commissioner.

There is no one to blame but myself for missing this most important news. At least misery loves company, it appears. Only five of the 12 NL LABR owners entered waiver bids by the Saturday deadline, picking up 10 players. So, six others joined me in inaction.

Being new to LABR this year is no excuse whatsoever. By my inaction, I put myself further behind the curve in a league where no mistakes can be tolerated.

Next week, I will have to be in catch-up mode, looking for nuggets in an already incredibly shallow player pool that will have 10 fewer players in it and almost nothing new to offer.

The message to you is simple – pay attention. After spending perhaps weeks in preparation for the draft, don’t lose your hard-earned edge in the days following.

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 17-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter.

Latest Tweets





Our Authors