Log in Register

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *
Username *
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *

fb mb tw mb

Tuesday 19th Sep 2017

We all know superstition is a big part of professional baseball, whether Wade Boggs’ pre-game meal of chicken or Pedro Cerrano’s voodoo doll Jobu from “Major League”.

Who is to say we fantasy players don’t have our own idiosyncrasies?

This came to mind with the 2017 Major League season just a few days old. In an e-mail exchange with my partner Lawr Michaels, he made a joke that spurred this article.

The two-time American League Tout Wars champion wistfully noted that both his Tout Wars and LABR squads were in first place. For that reason, Michaels wished the season could end right there.

My reply was at the complete opposite end of the spectrum. I admitted that I purposely had not yet checked the standings in any of my leagues. Lawr was disgusted with my answer while being unapologetic for his focus on the standings - even before any MLB team had gotten through its rotation a single time.

The reason is a logical one. After all, by its very name, the game is about fantasy, not reality. Michaels sees this as the one place in his world where he can obsess with no real impact or ramifications.

“Ugh. I cannot not look,” he said. “Fantasy is where I am allowed no self-control and all the second guessing I want. Just ideally nowhere else in life.”

Later on, he clarified his view.

“I am pretty clear the early results mean nothing,” Michaels said. “However, I like playing deep tough formats, and every day of play and every at-bat matters, so I certainly track the play of all my rosters carefully, especially early in the season to see if my guys look like they have jobs.

“But, I have always loved looking at box scores and lines and transactions, so really, checking my players and teams is just an offshoot of that fascination. At least that is the rationalization/excuse I have,” he concluded.

In my case, it isn’t that I am superstitious about looking at the standings. I just don’t want to get fixated on it so soon. Of course, I bid on and acquired players in the first free agent periods in all leagues to plug gaps.

I do, however, subscribe to the theory to give one’s drafted players a chance to produce. The time-honored tradition of sitting down over Memorial Day weekend to take stock of the roster is one I agree with.

That doesn’t mean that one can sleep on emerging free agents and not be poised to jump on mistakes by others.

I am still stinging over an unintended assist I gave Mike Gianella of Baseball Prospectus on route to his NL Tout victory in 2015. On draft day, I had spent a few bucks on Jeremy Hellickson, as the right-hander moved to the Arizona Diamondbacks.

Through mid-May, Hellickson was lugging around a 5.92 ERA and taking my Tout hopes down with him. Disgusted, I cut him loose. Gianella swooped in and from there through the remainder of the season, his new acquisition posted a 4.17 ERA, 1.20 WHIP and 93 strikeouts in 108 innings. It probably was not the season-maker or breaker, but it was the kind of mistake one remembers in a failed year.

Wondering if my reluctance to start standings-watching this soon is a complete anomaly, I asked the view of my Mastersball peers. Here are some of the replies.

For Todd Zola, there are administrative requirements to be on top of.

“I neither avoid nor check,” he replied. “If I see the standings as a matter of course, I'll look but I don't go to the scoring site just to check out the standings.

“I've moved a couple leagues over to a new commissioner service, so I'm monitoring to make sure it's doing what it's supposed to be doing, but short of that, it's all about replacing injured players and upgrading reserves, if possible,” Zola concluded.

Pasko Varnica is planning a major trip soon and thinks he could be distracted.

“Interesting. I thought about this very subject today,“ he said. “I asked myself why I am not checking the standings as I usually do. I concluded that it's probably because my upcoming trip is keeping my mind away from baseball.

“Here is my view: with such a small sample, many games postponed and such, I am more interested in individual performance up to now than the totals of standings. And specifically, my pitchers' performance. Are the basics, ERA, WHIP and strikeouts been fine in their first game? If so, then my team is ok,” Varnica noted.

Patrick Wisniewski’s league has a format that demands patience.

“I started doing this kind of stuff in my early 20's, when I used to live and die by the daily results,” he said. “As I've gotten older, I’ve learned patience is the key in baseball and to not waste all my moves by Memorial Day. My work league has a moves cap of 50, extended to 70 this year. Now I try to go to the 4th of July.”

Usage patterns and roles are first and foremost on Marc Meltzer’s mind.

“I am paying attention to the early season games to see how players on my team are being used,” he said. “Between potential platoon guys and wanna-be closers and making sure guys I am counting on are in the right situations.

“I don't really care about the specific league standings. I am also assessing my starting pitching with a close eye on waiver wire for guys who might have been overlooked on draft day,” Meltzer said.

Zach Steinhorn closes with an especially wise piece of advice.

“Although I'd be lying if I said that I ignore the standings entirely during the first few weeks (who doesn't like seeing their team gain 25 points in one day?), the standings really mean very little,” he said.

“I spend a lot more time studying box scores and identifying potential waiver wire pickups that could help to address a positional or categorical weakness that concerned me coming out of the draft. I also think it's important to resist the urge to make panic trades in April,” Steinhorn said.

So there you have it. Some good advice to focus on the basics early in the season, maybe even a harmless peek at the standings. But the time for wholesale changes, trade talk and wheeling and dealing should still be in the future.

Give your team a chance to deliver on the promise it showed you on draft day!

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 18-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter @B_Walton.

Having not carried three sons into this world as my wife did, I can only report on post-partum depression from the other side of the marriage equation. However, I had been experiencing a fantasy baseball version of those feelings this very week.

Instead of being delighted by the first week of Major League play and energized by the first round of free agent bidding in my various leagues, I find that I badly missed the excitement brought on through my March drafts. That was both from the actual selecting of players as well as the camaraderie of friends and league competitors.

What snapped me out of my doldrums was the notification of the start of Tout Wars Daily competition for 2017. But this is a different kind of daily game. It is a monthly and annual one, as well, all rolled together.

As I have discussed before, there are multiple reasons I have not jumped into standard DFS play with both feet. The most important is that I refuse to be mediocre - and being among the best does not occur by accident. Hard work is required and that takes time I do not have to allocate to DFS.

Another reason is that I get little satisfaction beating anonymous screen names. I highly value the competition against friends, whether from the industry or personal life.

Finally, money is nice, but it is not why I play.

Again in 2017, my colleagues from Tout Wars are sponsoring this season-long tournament, Tout Daily. It is a bit of a misnomer, as our competition is just one day per week. Each Friday, we will set a lineup for the day and our results will be one-fourth of the month’s scoring.

The top three scorers in each four-week period, from a pool that consists of three or four dozen competitors, will receive a ticket for the finals. Following the fifth four-week contest, those who have earned tickets receive entry to the one-week Tout Daily Championship.

In 2016, I performed well in the marathon only to fall disappointingly short in the final sprint. During the five four-week contests, I had earned two entries in the finals, tying two others with multiple berths.

Though there was nothing other than bragging rights attached, I just missed amassing the top total score over all 20 weekly contests. On a base of 1060 points over the season, I finished second by a minuscule 1.03 points to fast-finishing Todd Zola, my Mastersball partner.

Ultimately, in the finals, I fell short of winner Patrick Davitt of BaseballHQ, finishing fourth and eighth, respectively, among the 15 entries from 12 entrants. In an indication of how close the battle was, my fourth-place lineup was just 5.66 points behind Davitt.

I am delighted to participate again in 2017. In fact, even though there is cash involved, to be honest, I would put the same emphasis into winning for free.

I encourage all of you to approach your season-long league competitors and start a one-day per week DFS league. Whether it follows the Tout Daily format or one of your own choosing does not matter.

If you are looking for an easier way to stick your virtual toe in the water, we have the ideal vehicle! Our own Lord Zola plans to announce a Tout Daily-like free competition for Mastersball members. Watch the site for more information in the upcoming days on details and get ready to join us. You will not regret it!

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 18-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter @B_Walton.

Last Sunday evening in Phoenix, I once again had the pleasure of competing against fellow industry analysts and long-time friends at the 2017 League of Alternative Baseball Reality National League draft (LABR-NL). An exciting four-hour auction battle covered live on SiriusXM Radio ensued.

Rather than blather on about my team, which you can see among the others here, I will review several of the trends I experienced in hopes they might assist you in your preparation this spring.

I am rarely active early in auction drafts, preferring to get a feel for prices - but that changed this year. The gold standard for NL closers, Kenley Jansen, was the second player thrown out. Being caught with a minimal saves total in 2016 due to a failed gamble to cobble together saves in-season may have cost me the title. I had a firm hold on second-place most of the year, but saw no way to the top other than to attempt a Hail Mary play in September in which I made a series of trades to try to recover five lost months of saves in one month. It failed and I fell to third in the end. I vowed to not repeat that in 2017.

Obviously, at the point Jansen was thrown out on Sunday, the market for saves – or anything else, for that matter - had not yet been established, but I quickly decided to jump in, anyway. I paid a fair price of $22, but it soon became clear that it was not a bargain. The other top closers went in the $17-18 range with the next tier in the $11 neighborhood. Had I shown more patience, I would not have rostered as good of a closer as Jansen, but I could easily have saved $4-5.

Speaking of closers, though Fernando Rodney was part of my 2016 draft, I could still appreciate his appeal as a cheap $5 lottery pick. The proven closer on an improving team was a nice low-risk buy for Glenn Colton and Rick Wolf. Overall, the closer market was depressed, and in fact, much later on, I was able to roster both Hector Neris and Jeanmar Gomez for a total of $6. Unless Joaquin Benoit slips in and could hold the job in Philadelphia – which I doubt - I should have a leg up on saves this year with two NL teams’ ninth-innings covered. That would be a nice luxury in a 12-team format.

Jansen’s $22 price reminds me of another player who went for the same amount – Javier Baez. The Cubs star’s eligibility at second, third and short definitely has value – especially in a format in which active players cannot be moved to reserve unless injured or sent to the Minors. Still, I always pay special attention to prominent players on the prior season’s World Championship club for evidence of the halo effect. Since the Cubs just have a lot of very good players, I don’t know if it was truly a factor in why Baez’ price seemed high.

Since my primary volition is writing about the St. Louis Cardinals, which is well-known among my peers, anytime a St. Louis player is thrown out, I can feel a dozen pair of eyes moving to me. As seems often to be the case, my knowledge of the players’ warts as well as their strengths meant I ended the draft with zero members of the team. One surprising winning bid to me was $5 on Michael Wacha. If his shoulder continues to hold up, the right-hander will be worth double that price – or he could end up back on the disabled list – a risk I chose not to take.

One Cardinal who I did chase - and stayed in the bidding too long - was Carlos Martinez. While I like the young right-hander a lot, a duel with Perry Van Hook, drafting for Lenny Melnick, quickly escalated over $20. I admit I was relieved (and went church-mouse quiet) when Perry said, “$24”.

One of my perhaps more questionable choices was spending $15 on Pirates third baseman Jung-ho Kang, in limbo after his third DWI conviction in Korea. Concern by others at the table over the uncertain length of a likely suspension coupled with the unproven Josh Bell at first led to the price about which I was most surprised. David Freese sold for $9, a player I had in the $3 area. Despite Bell’s inexperience, he still was rostered for a robust $19, so it appears at least two others at the table were less concerned about his rookie season. Even so, the Bucs also have John Jaso as a first base option. He went for just $1, a deal I like far better than $9 for Freese.

I felt like I had plenty of choices at first base, but I found myself in a bit of a jam after bailing out perhaps too early on several of the big names, whose prices were high for my tastes. By the time my list was down to two primary choices, I did not go $23 on Brandon Belt, but ended up having to spend the same on Adrian Gonzalez. The alternative was to have to accept a lesser player at the position.

In terms of the competition, I can find something to like on every roster, but I especially admire the top end of the pitching staff of Steve Gardner - Max Scherzer, Zack Greinke and Kenta Maeda – acquired for a total of $55. Derek Van Riper also has a strong and deep rotation with Johnny Cueto, Jameson Taillon, Jeff Samardzija, Jerad Eickhoff and Ivan Nova. In part due to his usual strategy of minimal spend on pitching, $30 in total, 2016 second-place finisher Doug Dennis assembled a formidable offense, with just one hitter under $10 (Wilmer Flores at $7).

Following the LABR drafts, Lawr Michaels and I recorded a podcast with the leagues’ host, Steve Gardner of USA TODAY. We of course recap the AL and NL action, respectively. Check out the podcast here.


Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 18-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter @B_Walton.

This past weekend was the culmination of the annual industry draft season with Tout Wars, held in New York City. I am back for 2017 with the goal of winning my second National League-only title against some very challenging competitors, including defending champion Todd Zola of Mastersball.

I am not going into a player-by-player analysis of my draft. Since I don’t find it all that interesting to recap myself, I am guessing it would not be too enlightening to you, either. (However, you can reference all of the Tout drafts via this Google doc.)

Not unlike many of your leagues, perhaps, most of the NL Tout participants have been at this for many years. Couple that with their strong knowledge of the player base and the fact that a number of industry leagues in which we participate have already been held, it means there really are not that many secrets.

In fact, one of my industry friends told me that because I had already drafted a team in NL LABR, my 2017 strategy, player and pricing preferences were known.

That was not the case. For example, I went with one of the top catchers in Tout, Willson Contreras, for $16, after spending just half of that combined on my catchers in LABR. That required me to spend less on one of my outfielders in Tout. There was some risk here because the under-$10 outfield pool was thin.

Even if that was not the situation, I always try to keep enough cash at the end to avoid dollar days. The main reason is that I want to be able to get the best players in the end game without being repeatedly picked off by others. Of course, as in everything, moderation is needed or one could end up leaving cash (and stats) on the table.

In the late part of the draft, I was pleased to acquire Michael Saunders ($7) and Andrew Toles ($6) to complete my outfield. This part of my plan worked especially well as I had $3 remaining for my final player, which I successfully bid on who I consider the best power prospect who should come up this season, Cody Bellinger of the Dodgers.

Looking back, one wouldn’t have learned much about my supposed favored players. I have just five common names across both Tout and LABR and none are what I consider core players – Jose Reyes ($14), David Peralta ($16) and Toles along with pitchers Jon Gray ($13) and Tyler Anderson ($2).

While there are always players I like better than others, there is no one I would pursue at all costs. For example, I had hoped to acquire Carlos Martinez to anchor my staff, but I backed out of the bidding when it became clear I would have to pay at least $27 and perhaps even more.

My primary strategy is to establish a core group of players from among a group of candidates and then look for value the rest of the way. I do not come in with the intention to punt any categories, though my OBP may require intervention.

Another tenet I follow is to avoid the peak-price players (generally over $30). Even so, my core as drafted is solid. They include a steals leader, Dee Gordon ($26), an OBP and power threat in Christian Yelich ($28), an ace in Jake Arrieta ($22) and a top closer in Mark Melancon ($20). This gives me a good start at a balanced performance.

Another important factor in an only-league is to maximize counting stats. On offense, that means getting 14 players with clear starting jobs. Finding hitters via waivers in-season who can contribute can be quite challenging. On the pitching side, I go starter-heavy. I may have to jettison one or two down the line, but my experience is that setup men with good ratios are always available on the waiver wire.

From a budget perspective, I came in with a general plan as to how much I would spend for each position based on potential target players, but use that as a guideline rather than a strict rule. In terms of hitting-pitching balance, I planned for a $182-$78 split and ended up at $185-$75. The league average was $183-$77. However, two of my colleagues were at the opposite extremes.

Defending champion Zola went heavy on pitching, spending $103 on arms, while Phil Hertz of BaseballHQ allocated $201 for offense. I asked each about their respective strategies.

Zola did not plan for this mix, but went where he saw value, keeping a mind toward trading later. (I did the same thing in acquiring steals.)

“I spent an extra $15-$20 on pitching which can be accounted for in two areas: Madison Bumgarner and a third closer,” Zola said. “I budgeted about $20 for my staff anchor, but when MadBum came in a few bucks under where I expected him to land (bought at $29), I decided to take that and not risk the next tier selling higher than expected. The plan at that time was to take away $10 from the rest of the staff, but it obviously didn't work out that way.

“The third closer was taking what the market gave me. I already had Seung Hwan Oh and Raisel Iglesias. After buying Iglesias, my thinking was to nominate every remaining saves candidate so no one would go really cheap. Then I realized if someone does go cheap, why shouldn't I be the recipient?

“There's obviously trading and it's really hard to get a surplus in a category from which to deal. Maybe I have more confidence that Brandon Maurer fends off Carter Capps, but if proven correct, I have a commodity to deal. If no one else trusts Maurer to hold the job, I can even deal Oh and compete in saves with just Iglesias and Maurer,” Zola concluded.

Hertz came in with a plan and executed it.

“I used ‘total control drafting’ in that I decided in advance to spend $205-210 on hitting and $50-55 on pitching,” Hertz said. “I targeted several players, notably Kris Bryant ($37), Billy Hamilton ($26) and Freddie Freeman ($39), as guys I wanted to build my team around. I also decided to neglect catching and in all likelihood saves.

“Regarding Hamilton, I decided that I would get him early -- he was the second guy I threw out -- and if successful, then I could pretty much 'ignore' speed the rest of the draft. I actually got him for less than I budgeted, which allowed me to go higher than my budget on Freeman.

“On the pitching side, my plan was to get two mid-tier starters, two or three upside starters, and then some guys who had a shot at closing at some point this year. I thought that would cost me $50-55. I spent a little more, in part because I wound up with three second tier guys (although one is Steven Matz and that money might be a waste).

“I was also very happy with the upside options I wound up with, including Wily Peralta in the reserve rounds. On the save side, I got what I wanted -- indeed right now I'm projected to get four points in saves, since three other owners wound up with even less in that realm than I,” said Hertz.

So there you have it – a look into how I approached the NL Tout draft as well as a view of two peers who had very different approaches. May you apply that which can help you and ignore the rest. No matter what, here is hoping you have successful drafts this spring!


Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 18-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter @B_Walton.

Those who read my columns regularly (when they are actually about fantasy baseball league rules) may recall that I often stress two things. One is to religiously follow your league constitution to the letter wherever possible. The other is to keep your league rules fresh and current.

Ideally, if the latter is executed well, the former can more easily follow. However, being realistic, no set of rules, no matter how comprehensive they are, can handle every possible situation. Or can they?

In one of my keeper leagues, populated by a group of highly-experienced, opinionated and very busy industry players, a problem recently presented itself that brought this to life. When submitting keepers this past fall, one owner inadvertently listed a player at first base and outfield, when in reality, the player had lost his prior eligibility at first.

For the November auction draft, the player in question was placed at first base on the keeper roster, but no one noticed the problem until afterward. Now, the situation had multiplied. This owner had six outfielders and no corner infielder, with no multi-position eligibility players who could be shifted. In other words, an illegal roster had been drafted.

The good news in the bad is that not only had this happened before in the league, but a rule change had been enacted afterward to address the situation.

In the current case, draft day logs verified that the last outfielder chosen was considered the illegal transaction, so that purchase would be voided. (The owner’s utility spot, another possibility, had been filled earlier in the draft.) That extra outfielder will be returned to the free agent pool for the league’s Stage Two draft in March and carry a cap and keeper value of one dollar less than the price paid on draft day. The rules clearly spelled this out.

The bad news is that the formal rule change was incomplete. As written, it did not specify how the illegally-drafted player would be replaced on the offending owner’s roster. In this example, governing how and when the owner would be allowed to fill his open corner infield spot was not explicitly documented.

An approach was initially suggested that seemed fair - at first blush. The offending owner could pick a replacement corner infielder from the undrafted player pool. That replacement player would carry the same value – relevant for cap and keeper purposes – as the illegally-drafted one.

However, I was less comfortable with this idea the more I thought about it. Since this same situation had occurred before, how did we deal with it then? Though we probably don’t remember, let’s try to go back and reconstruct how we dealt with the replacement player at that time. Even if we did not write it all into the rules, we should act consistently.

Fortunately, the league SWAT found the old emails. From them, it was determined the prior offending owner was allowed an extra pick to fill his roster at the end of the league’s Stage Two draft. That is a serpentine-style draft held in March. Of course, the owner does not have to wait until the last round to select a new corner infielder to ensure he has a valid lineup for opening day. Also, he is not precluded from re-drafting the initially illegally-chosen outfielder as a reserve.

Once we discovered we had a clear precedent, how to address the problem was as simple as A-B-C - Always Be Consistent.

Our final step was to add one sentence to the constitution - to put the already-established precedent into a clear rule governing how the replacement player is to be chosen. That way, when this happens again, which it likely will, it can be resolved even more easily.

In this example, the rules did their job, but they still needed our help. Making sure that past decisions were remembered kept us from potentially creating a new rule when the old one ended up serving us just fine.

Brian Walton was the 2009 National League Tout Wars champion, scoring the most points in the league’s 18-year history. He also holds the all-time NL Tout single-season records for wins and saves. His work can also be found daily at TheCardinalNation.com and thecardinalnationblog.com. Follow Brian on Twitter @B_Walton.

Latest Tweets





Our Authors